Bloodshed in the Sahara - The Mali Question and the Tuareg Cause

French troops in Mali

French troops in Mali

A few days ago, French president Hollande declared French intervention in Mali had begun in an attempt to push back Islamist rebels far away from the Malian capital, Bamako, after months of quick and bloody advance towards the heart of the Mali government. The French started with air strikes to destabilize the Islamists, now thousands of French troops are in the country in a major ground assault. Less than 48 hours after this operation (Operation Serval) began, Armed Islamists seized a gas facility in the deserts of Southern Algeria, In Amenas, and held many foreign workers as well as Algerians hostage in what is turning out to be one of the worst international hostage crises in decades.

Many people are asking the question why is France taking on Islamists in far-away northern Mali thousands of miles from Paris? Some are wondering whether this will be another long, bloody war like Iraq or Afghanistan? Is this bullying on the side of France, some have even asked? The answer to these lies in the history of Mali itself and the plight of the Tuareg people in the north, and of course the political landscape of Algeria between 1991 - 2002, when Islamists waged a bloody war against the central government in Algiers. Everything is inter-connected.

This war is about the the Tuareg rebels taking advantage of a weak government in Bamako, to rapidly push back the largely under-equipped Malian forces in the north in an attempt to create a separate state. Tuaregs are nomadic-pastoralists occupying a large part of central north-west Africa stretching all the way through the Sahara desert to southern parts of Libya, Algeria and Tunisia. They have long clamored for independence and a separate state of their own but have been brutally suppressed for nearly a century . Going back as far as 1916, during French colonial times, the Tuaregs have staged 5 major rebellions till 2012, all ending in failure with thousands of Tuaregs losing their lives to brutal repression from the French colonial forces and subsequently the central government in Bamako. 

Mali is a poor West-African country, with crippling levels of corruption and a largely underfunded military force. The Touareg rebellion in the north presented a serious challenge to the government which struggled to combat the insurgence in the north. In 2012, a miltary coup toppled the 10 year reign of President Ahmadou Toure, when a section of the army, who cited the government's inability to equip the military well enough, took over government of the country. In a series of talks and negotiations, power has now been restored to an acting, interim President, Dioncounda Traore. But in the meantime, the Tuareg insurgency has made rapid gains on the ground to take over major northern cities including the historical Timbuktu and more recently the garrison towns of Diabaly in a major push towards the south, where Bamako, the capital lies.

It is this aggression that has triggered the recent French intervention, in an attempt to halt the advance of the Tuareg rebels. But from well documented sources, the Tuareg rebels are not what they appear to be. It has been revealed that actually, the rapid advance is the work of AQIM (Al- Qaeda in the Islamic Mahgreb), the north African arm of al-Qaeda. These fighters have taken advantage of a legitimate Tuareg rebellion to achieve their own aims, which is to have a safe haven for Al-Qaeda in Africa. Why is Al-Qaeda interested in Mali though, you may ask. 

Northern Mali, due to its lack of full government control over the years, have served as a safe area for Islamists ejected from the "dirty war" in Algeria in the early 1990s where they fought a brutal war with the government to establish Islamic rule in Algeria. Many of those fighters are well trained and well armed. They have lived in northern Mali now for many years, mixing with local Tuaregs (who are Animists by tradition), and establishing forms of Islamic codes in the areas of their settlement. During the Tuareg uprising of 2012, what was not immediately apparent was that, the rapid advance was a joint effort by the rebels and well-armed Islamists, who rapidly gained contriol of vast areas in the north, including Timbuktu. The population of Timbuktu have been under the rule of Islamists for around 10 months now since the taking-over by Islamists. Severe forms of Sharia have been reportedly established in these areas, against the wish of the Tuareg populations. An example of a culture clash is that, in Tuareg culture, its the man that covers his face with a turban, the women don't, but in Islam, it is women that have to cover their face. 

Tuareg people

Tuareg people

France and the government of Mali are worried that the north of Mali is fast becoming a safe haven for al-Qaeda militants taking advantage of a largely uncontrolled area and pushing to establish an Islamic state, not only in the north, but throughout Mali. There are French interests in Mali, mainly in the form of thousands of French expatriates, working inside the country and the fact that a haven for Islamists in Mali could be dangerous to France (and the rest of Europe), which is just a few thousands of miles from the heart of France. 

As much as I believe that the Tuaregs are a brutally oppressed people and need to be heard by the world, their mixing with Islamists for temporary gains is cultural suicide to say the least. The situation of the Tuaregs as a people is a humanitarian issue that Western governments are not keen to explore. But help from Islamists will not help their cause either. 

In the light of these circumstances, the French are not wrong to try to push back this advance by Islamists (masquerading as Tuaregs), form taking over Mali. There is a major problem breeding in Africa in my opinion, with Islamic extremists taking root in a number of countries like Somalia, Kenya, Nigeria, Cameroon and Mali. Mali in my opinion is what could happen when weak and  unstable governments cannot control sections of their own countries, opening the doors to fundamentalists with an agenda, which is to put as many parts of Africa as possible under strict Sharia law. These fundamentalists are well trained, well funded and well equipped to bring down most African governments, so maybe outside help is not that bad an option. But we shall see how the Mali situation unfolds in the coming weeks. 

"Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's...." - Should Nigeria's multi-million dollar churches pay tax?

God is big business in Nigeria, and the pastors dont hide it either. Nigeria is home to some of the wealthiest pastors in the world, with a total net worth of millions of dollars. According to Forbes Magazine in 2011, the top ten richest Nigerian pastors have an estimated total wealth of over $300million dollars. These are major-league, business-savvy guys that dont just draw millions of followers but earn their respect too. But is this all for God as they would make us believe? 

Nigeria is a poor country by western standards, but in the middle of it lies a wealthy elite, not the corrupt politicians this time, but church leaders. Prosperity gospel is the new buzz word in Nigeria, and it preaches that God's blessing is directly proportional to financial prosperity, and wealth is a form of reward to those who serve God faithfully. In a country where many parts of the population struggle to keep bread on the table, this sort of message surely has mass appeal. But the hope of prosperity doesn't come cheap as followers have to "give so that they can receive". So every Sunday service, Nigerians donate generously to their churches and expect to be uplifted by God and rewarded in "ten folds". Some Churches hold up to three different services on every given Sunday. I am sure that the total amount of tithes donated by Nigerian church goers every Sunday must run into millions of dollars. The church leaders tell their congregation that all the money is to expand the church and spread the word of God farther and wider. Now lets look at some of these wealthy pastors and their assets:

1. Bishop David Oyedepo

Officially the wealthiest Pastor in Nigeria, David Oyedepo, 58, has an estimated net worth of $150 million (2011 Forbes Magazine). He is the founder of Living Faith World Outreach, also known as Winner's Chapel, founded in 1981. The Winners' Chapel network of churches is present in over 300 cities and towns in Nigeria, as well as in over 63 cities in 32 other African Nations, Dubai, the United Kingdom and the United States of America (Wikipedia). Bishop Oyedepo's Faith Tabernacle in Lagos, headquarters of Winners' Chapel seats 55,000 Nigerians comfortably every Sunday, it is the largest church space on the continent I would say. Affectionately refered to as "Papa" by congregation members, Oyedepo owns 4 private jets with homes in London and the US. He also owns Dominion Publishing House which publishes all the ministry's books. He recently launched an airline, Dominion Airline, through which he now puts his private jets to commercial use. He has got investments in the education sector and owns Convenant University, an elite institution that caters for some of Nigeria's upper class children. Oyedepo was embroiled in a 2011 controversy where a video of one of his church services appeared to show him accusing children of witchcraft and slapping one of them in full glare of the congregation. See video here

Officially the wealthiest Pastor in Nigeria, David Oyedepo, 58, has an estimated net worth of $150 million (2011 Forbes Magazine). He is the founder of Living Faith World Outreach, also known as Winner's Chapel, founded in 1981. The Winners' Chapel network of churches is present in over 300 cities and towns in Nigeria, as well as in over 63 cities in 32 other African Nations, Dubai, the United Kingdom and the United States of America (Wikipedia). Bishop Oyedepo's Faith Tabernacle in Lagos, headquarters of Winners' Chapel seats 55,000 Nigerians comfortably every Sunday, it is the largest church space on the continent I would say. Affectionately refered to as "Papa" by congregation members, Oyedepo owns 4 private jets with homes in London and the US. He also owns Dominion Publishing House which publishes all the ministry's books. He recently launched an airline, Dominion Airline, through which he now puts his private jets to commercial use. He has got investments in the education sector and owns Convenant University, an elite institution that caters for some of Nigeria's upper class children. Oyedepo was embroiled in a 2011 controversy where a video of one of his church services appeared to show him accusing children of witchcraft and slapping one of them in full glare of the congregation. See video here

2. Chris Oyhakilome

Popularly known as "Pastor Chris", 51, is the founder of Believers' Loveworld Ministries also known as Christ Embassy. With an estimated net worth of between $30 million - $50 million, Pastor Chris runs an elite congregation including successful business executives and high level politicians. He owns three television channels: LoveWorld TV, LoveWorld SAT and LoveWorld Plus. His other interests include newspapers, hotels and extensive real estate. His Loveworld TV Network holds the record for the first Christian network to broadcast from Africa on a 24-hour basis. Pastor Chris was embroiled in a 2010 court case over money laundering, but the case was eventually dismissed.

Popularly known as "Pastor Chris", 51, is the founder of Believers' Loveworld Ministries also known as Christ Embassy. With an estimated net worth of between $30 million - $50 million, Pastor Chris runs an elite congregation including successful business executives and high level politicians. He owns three television channels: LoveWorld TV, LoveWorld SAT and LoveWorld Plus. His other interests include newspapers, hotels and extensive real estate. His Loveworld TV Network holds the record for the first Christian network to broadcast from Africa on a 24-hour basis. Pastor Chris was embroiled in a 2010 court case over money laundering, but the case was eventually dismissed.

3. Temitope Joshua

Age: 49. Popularly known as TB Joshua, is one of Africa's most controversial pastors, with a net worth of between $10 million - $15 million, he is founder and head of the Synagogue Church of All Nations. His spaectacular miracle sessions that claim to heal diseases like cancer, HIV/AIDS, have won him attention across the world, and has been seen with many famous African Presidents including late Fredrick Chiluba of Zambia. He runs a satellite TV channel, Emmanuel TV, and won awards from the Nigerian Government in recognition of his charitable work. 

 4. Matthew Ashimolowo

Founder of Kingsway International Christian Centre (KICC), the largest Pentecostal Church in the United Kingdom. In 2009, Ashimolowo's church posted profits of close to $10million and assets worth $40million. He runs a media company, Ashimolowo Media, which produces Christian literature and documentaries.

Founder of Kingsway International Christian Centre (KICC), the largest Pentecostal Church in the United Kingdom. In 2009, Ashimolowo's church posted profits of close to $10million and assets worth $40million. He runs a media company, Ashimolowo Media, which produces Christian literature and documentaries.

These are just four of the handful of Nigerian super-rich pastors who preside over multi-million dollar congregations, or are they "corporations"?

In Nigeria, Churches and other places of worship are designated as charity organisations hence do not pay corporation tax, nor pay capital gains tax on disposal of their assets. Traditionally, churches are regarded as places that provide help for the poor, take care of the homeless and carry out a lot of public good. Taxing them, it is assumed, will mean religious persecution. Some have pointed out also that exempting religious organisations from tax is a way to maintain separation of Religion and the State. Taxing churches, it is said, will put a great deal of power in the hands of government who may abuse it. 

At the same time though, not taxing these big churches that make millions of dollars every year amounts to a significant lost revenue for government, and an enrichment of a few who are clever enough to hide all their business exploits under the name of charity. Even Jesus said one of his sermons when asked whether Christians should pay tax, he said "give unto Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's". Churches nowadays, particularly the Pentecostal ones, have evolved into a cash generating machine for its founders. The founders claim their business exploits are to expand the church and spread the word of God and they do not own personal assets, all belongs to the church. But for whose benefit? Nigeria's poverty level is increasing every year as many thousands of peoplecontinue to live below the poverty line. So what have these churches done to alleviate poverty in Nigeria. In my opinion you should solve one problem before moving to the next. Instead of these churches expanding all over the world, staying in Nigeria and improving the lives of its ordinary people will be a laudable project. If there are fewer homeless people on the streets of Lagos due to the work of these churches, I am sure the world will commend them. If members of these churches have access to free or subsidised healthcare, then they are doing something significant for the society. If poor village children who cannot afford even school shoes are helped to go to school, then they are helping society. How can they all earn these millions and not improve their environment? But rather they continue to open more branches everywhere else in the world. 

These pastors also shy away from politics and rarely criticise government. Instead we see them at the echelons of power wining and dining with presidents and senators, they tell us they are praying for Nigeria. Well, maybe they need to do more than pray, action will be better. We need to see these big pastors use their immense power and influence to transform Nigeria for good. But you know what, that will never happen. Many politicians attend these churches and their tithes are not small. They donate "major-league" cash.

Every corner you turn in Nigeria there is a church and a pastor claiming to speak to God directly, hence can solve problems. But no Pastor has come up with the solution to the deteriorating security situation in the north of the country, nor any solution to the corruption that has engulfed the country from top to bottom. Yet they talk to God everyday and are "God's anointed". 

I wrote this article not as a solution but an examination of the rise of big corporations disguised as Pentecostal Churches in Nigeria. It is time Nigerians wake up and recognise that the solution to our problems does not lie with the big pastors, rather they may be part of the problem.

HIV, Profit and The Poor - The EU-India Free Trade Agreement

Anti-retroviral drugs (courtesy guardian.co.uk)I was reading the newspaper this morning when an article caught my attention, the ongoing controversial Free Trade Agreement (FTA) talks between the European Union (EU) and Indian authorities. The part of the talks that address the issue of generic drugs production baffles me the most. 

Anti-retroviral drugs (courtesy guardian.co.uk)I was reading the newspaper this morning when an article caught my attention, the ongoing controversial Free Trade Agreement (FTA) talks between the European Union (EU) and Indian authorities. The part of the talks that address the issue of generic drugs production baffles me the most. 

India is the world's single largest producer of generic drugs which have saved millions of lives in developing countries due to its affordability and easy access by the most desperate. Generic drugs are exact copies of branded ones made by the giant pharmaceutical companies in Europe and America. The only difference is price and this is due to the fact that generic drug manufacturers do not have to cover cost of research, clinical trials, product development etc. Obviously the pharmaceutical companies are not happy that their sweat and labour is being easily duplicated in India and passed on to millions across the developing world at far cheaper prices. Take for example five years after anti-retroviral drugs were introduced in the West in 1996, death rates from  HIV/AIDS infections dropped by 84% in developed countries, but only 2% of sufferers in developing countries had access to these medicines, solely because they were unaffordable. The drug combination cost around $15000 per person per year, a figure beyond the wildest dreams of the average African, for example. Hence HIV continued to spread like wildfire. Just at the turn of the millenium, an Indian company started to produce exact copies of these drugs (known as generic forms) at a far lower cost hence lowering the price. This sparked a price war between branded and generic drug manufacturers. Coupled with pressure from NGOs and civil society organisations, activists etc, the price for anti-retroviral drugs dropped drastically. By the end of 2001, the triple combination therapy anti-retroviral drugs were available from Indian manufacterers at around $295 per person per year!

The price has even been reduced further over the years, making the millions of HIV patients in Africa and Asia have access to life-saving anti-retroviral drugs. Now the EU wants India to reassess this situation as it complains Europe's pharmaceutical companies are losing out on billions of dollars each year to cheap generic drug manufacture in India. 

AIDS patientThis has infuriated many NGOs like Oxfam, Medecins Sans Frontieres and others who work tirelessly to help HIV patients in developing countries have access to treatment. Many believe that if the proposed FTA is adopted, it will shut out the world's most vulnerable people from getting treatment. Actually, access to AIDS treatment is one thing, generic drugs also provide a lifeline for many patients suffering from other diseases in developing countries, including tuberculosis. Branded drugs are just beyond the reach of these people. So how on earth can this problem be solved?

AIDS patientThis has infuriated many NGOs like Oxfam, Medecins Sans Frontieres and others who work tirelessly to help HIV patients in developing countries have access to treatment. Many believe that if the proposed FTA is adopted, it will shut out the world's most vulnerable people from getting treatment. Actually, access to AIDS treatment is one thing, generic drugs also provide a lifeline for many patients suffering from other diseases in developing countries, including tuberculosis. Branded drugs are just beyond the reach of these people. So how on earth can this problem be solved?

The proposed FTA is attempting to include intellectual property rights into the negotiation, and prevent Indian companies from copying the drugs for as long as the patent rights exist, which in many cases could be as long as 15-20 years. This literally means an end to affordable drug supply to Africa and other developing nations. Many have condemned the proposals as morally wrong and puts profit before lives. The pandemic is highest in sub-Saharan Africa where about 250million people suffer from HIV/AIDS and new infections happen everyday. Children, women and whole families have been wiped out due to this disease. Yet companies are more concerned with making huge profits than saving lives. 

This makes me question sometimes whether this same thinking is responsible for the inability of these pharmaceutical companies to come up with a cure after all these years. Maybe the logic that huge investments into finding a cure for AIDS will not yield adequate returns in terms of profits, is actually preventing the discovery of a cure. Then who do we blame, the generic drugs manufacturers saving lives, or the branded drug manufacturers after profits? I know its not that simple but I'm sure a concerted effort by the world's greatest pharmaceutical companies to help developing countries fight HIV will work if profits margins are ignored for a while. I do understand that they are companies and need to break even, but they can work with Western governments and charities  to source funding aimed specifically at vulnerable nations to provide access to affordable drugs. The generic drugs companies could work hand-in-hand with the pharmaceutical giants to ensure lives come before profit. I am not an expert on these issues, but I really hope the ongoing FTA talks do not end up denying the epicenter of the deadly epidemic of HIV/AIDS, Africa, the much needed help it deserves.